The picture here does not quite do the real thing justice. I believe that I saw a large collection of Haystacks at the Chicago Art Institute. If you have a chance, go there to check these large pictures out.

malware

Unfortunately some of the older posts's pictures are gone as I upgraded to a newer version of WordPress - I will fix that later.

Once everything is configured and you actually connect to the POP3 box, Windows/Outlook gives you an error message telling you:

"The server you are connected to is using a security certificate that could not be verified. A certificate chain processed, but terminated in a root certificate which is not trusted by the trust provider. Do you want to continue using this server?"

So what is really happening? SSL certificates are weird things – the way I understand them is that when you buy a certificate from a Certification Authority like Verisign, the certificate that you get points to a root certificate from Verisign. That Verisign root certificate (and other root certificates from other certification authorities is installed by default by Microsoft. When your computer makes a connection via SSL to the server, it can and does check the server's certificate. Following the chain of certificates to the root, it finds the Verisign Root certificate. Since this certificate matches the root certificate already installed, everything is good.

Why are we getting that self-signed certificate error, then? What happened is that it is possible for people to generate a certificate that is self-signed, meaning it does not link to a trusted Certification Authority. In this case, the root certificate does not match anything on the system, and a warning message is displayed. Hostpapa must have just used self-signed certificates, making things harder for the users.

I have found two different methods to get the certificate, either using OpenSSL or using Firefox 3. I'm sure there are others, but both of these methods work.

Method#1 to get the Certificate: Using OpenSSL

Download OpenSSL for Windows and install it:

Open a command line prompt (start->run->cmd)

At the command prompt (c:\>) type:

cd \program files\gnuwin32\bin

Then type in the following commands:

openssl s_client -connect hp12.hostpapa.com:995 > file.txt

[replace hp12.hostpapa.com with the server name showing in cPanel]

Ctrl+C (to exit the program)

openssl x509 -in file.txt -outform DER -out hostpapa.der

start hostpapa.der

This starts the certificate import wizard.

Click Install Certificate

Click Next

Click Next

Method #2 for getting the SSL Certificate, using only Firefox

You will need the Firefox 3 web browser installed for this to work. Note the number of dialogs and clicks required to get you where you want. You will feel like a criminal doing this but it is perfectly legitimate and safe.

1. Open your Firefox browser, in url box type about:config and press enter.
2. In next screen you will get a warning message click on "I will be careful, I promise!" button.
3. In next screen search for "network.security.ports.banned.override".
4. If this string is not there write click anywhere in the firefox text window and click on new and then select string.
5. You will get a box says " Enter the preference name" in its text box give the name "network.security.ports.banned.override" and press ok.
6. In next screen you have to give the string value. This string value is port number of your port.
7. If you want to allow all port then please give 0-65535. It will allow all the port. If you want to give some specific port then you can give those specific port using comma separated value example 101, 102, 103 etc. Choose only 995 for HostPapa, because POP3 SSL runs on this port
8. Start Firefox and enter the following URL: https://hp12.hostpapa.com:995

Click "Or you can add an exception"

Click Add an exception

Click Get Certificate

Click View, select the Details tab

Click Export

Choose x.509 Certificate, click save, and close all the Firefox dialogs

Double Click the hp12.hostpapa.der certificate, and choose to install the certificate. Method #1 shows the dialogs on Windows Vista that show up when importing the certificate.

Note that you are importing the certificate only for the current user. If you want to import for all users on the machine, you must use the MMC

Start->Run->MMC.exe

File->Add /Remove SnapIn -> Locate Certmgr.msc in c:\windows\system32

Indicate Local machine

Open ConsoleRoot->Certificates(LocalComputer)->Trusted Root Certification Authorities->Certificates

Right-click on Certificates->All Tasks->Import

Follow the wizard to import the saved certificate

Yes, he seems to have had a long set of names… The painting (Dance of youth) conveys movement and energy, but has the dove of peace as the symbol in the centre, flying while at the same time still. Look at the figure at 12 o clock in the circle - it is drawn in such a simple, yet incredibly expressive way.

Shalom!

The UI was designed in Expression Blend, although I admit that I often went back to editing the XML manually. Maybe this is how you are supposed to use Blend, or I just don't know yet how to do this in Blend. One thing to note is that even though the application is localized, the UI still shows up both in Blend and in the Visual Studio 2008 editor. For the curious, I am using Approach #1 from my CodeProject Article on localization. (You will need to download and install the ResXFileCodeGeneratorEx addin to compile the sample.)

I must admit that I borrowed some ideas from Josh Smith's article on Model View Controller Unit Testing WPF. Let us focus on the commands for now:

public static class Commands
{
    public static readonly RoutedUICommand Button1Command;
    public static readonly RoutedUICommand Button2Command;
 
    static Commands()
    {
        Button1Command = new RoutedUICommand(Strings.Button1, "Button1Command",
            typeof (Commands));
        Button2Command = new RoutedUICommand(Strings.Button2, "Button2Command",
            typeof (Commands));
    }
}

So this is just a static class containing static commands that are initialized as soon as the class is referenced for the first time. Note that the names come from a string resource, and this helps in the localization. Now how do we use the commands?

This code is part of the MainWindow.xaml, right under the Window tag. What it does is tell WPF that we wish to intercept the commands we list under the <Window.CommandBindings> tag. Now the command itself comes from the static class I just showed. Note the use of the 'DemoApplication' namespace identifier; for this to work we have to define/import the namespace which is done as an attribute of the Window tag like so:

xmlns:DemoApplication="clr-namespace:DemoApplication;assembly="

The command also has two attributes, the CanExecute and Executed, which point to code-behind found in the MainWindow.cs. The CanExecute determines if the command is available, and the Executed delegate is fired when the command is invoked. Here is what the implementation looks like:

private void Button1_CanExecute(object sender, CanExecuteRoutedEventArgs e)
{
    e.CanExecute = true;
}
 
private void Button1_Executed(object sender, ExecutedRoutedEventArgs e)
{
    MessageBox.Show(Strings.TextIs + mViewModel.EditBoxContents, Strings.ButtonPressed);
}
 
private void Button2_CanExecute(object sender, CanExecuteRoutedEventArgs e)
{
    e.CanExecute = true;
}
 
private void Button2_Executed(object sender, ExecutedRoutedEventArgs e)
{
    mViewModel.EditBoxContents = Strings.ResetText;
}

Now we have the commands defined and created and hooked up the delegates that actually handle the commands (and if the command is available), it is time to hook up the command to both to the buttons and to the menus.

 
<Menu DockPanel.Dock="Top">
  <MenuItem Header="{x:Static Properties:Strings.TopLevelMenu}" >
    <MenuItem Header="{x:Static Properties:Strings.Button1}"
              Command="{x:Static DemoApplication:Commands.Button1Command}" >
      <MenuItem.Icon>
        <Image Source="Icons/control_play.png"/>
      </MenuItem.Icon>
    </MenuItem>
    <MenuItem Header="{x:Static Properties:Strings.Button2}"
              Command="{x:Static DemoApplication:Commands.Button2Command}" >
      <MenuItem.Icon>
        <Image Source="Icons/control_stop.png"/>
      </MenuItem.Icon>
    </MenuItem>
  </MenuItem>
</Menu>
 
<Button Content="{x:Static Properties:Strings.Button1}"
        Command="{x:Static DemoApplication:Commands.Button1Command}"
        Grid.Row="1"
        VerticalAlignment="Top" />
<Button Content="{x:Static Properties:Strings.Button2}"
        Command="{x:Static DemoApplication:Commands.Button2Command}"
        Grid.Column="1"
        Grid.Row="1"
        VerticalAlignment="Top" />
 

The localized app in French looks as follows:


The English version is here:


Enough for now - good night!

 
pre
{
	border: 1px solid #ccc; padding: 0em 0.5em;
	background-color: #FBEDBB;
	padding: 5pt;
	font: 9pt "Courier New", Courier, mono;
	white-space: pre;
	overflow:auto;
}
 

The following is an example of what C# code looks like:

 
public partial class Window1
{
    private readonly ApplicationViewModel mViewModel;
 
    public Window1()
    {
        InitializeComponent();
        mViewModel = new ApplicationViewModel();
        DataContext = mViewModel;
    }
 
    private void Button1_CanExecute(object sender, CanExecuteRoutedEventArgs e)
    {
        e.CanExecute = true;
    }
 
    private void Button1_Executed(object sender, ExecutedRoutedEventArgs e)
    {
        MessageBox.Show("Text is: " + mViewModel.EditBoxContents, "Button Pressed");
    }
 
    private void Button2_CanExecute(object sender, CanExecuteRoutedEventArgs e)
    {
        e.CanExecute = true;
    }
 
    private void Button2_Executed(object sender, ExecutedRoutedEventArgs e)
    {
        mViewModel.EditBoxContents = "Reset";
    }
}
 

This is what XAML code looks like:

 
<Application x:Class="DemoApplication.App"
    xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
    xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
    StartupUri="Window1.xaml">
    <Application.Resources>
    </Application.Resources>
</Application>
 

Normally I use Word 2007 to write the blog entries, it is very convenient. However, you can't use it to post code, as it does not make the round trip (loading, editing, saving) without royally screwing up.

I really like this work of art, called "The Kiss" – look at the gentle, almost hesitant way the man's hand is placed on the woman's thigh, and the way the woman holds her arm to embrace and approach her lover with a mixture of submission and desire. The sculpture radiates erotic energy; look at the way the man's muscular arms, the woman's back and legs and how the feet of both figures are sculpted. This shows how much of a genius Rodin really was.

As part of the outreach committee of our Church, we are trying to find new ways of interacting with the community around us. One of the criticisms of our community is that it is a too inward-focused ministry, and we are trying to change this. The last time, the outreach committee met at the "416 Community Drop-in for women" at 416 Dundas Street East, close to Dundas and Parliament. The executive director, Rosie Smythe greeted us, and Pastor Schweter, Ed, Karin, Stephanie and myself asked her some questions regarding the operation of the drop-in – what they do and what their needs are. She also showed us the facility, housed in an old three storey Victorian-style house. This organization is not faith-based like the "Gateway" Salvation Army men's shelter that we had visited on an earlier occasion.

The drop-in is a facility targeting women 30 years of age and older (and transgendered persons) and is open from 8:00am to about 4:00pm seven days a week. They serve breakfast and lunch to more than 60 women on a daily basis. The clientele that frequents the drop-in are "difficult to serve" kind, because many of them have moderate to not so moderate mental illness, alcohol and/or drug dependencies and other problems. The facility offers medical services; a nurse and doctor are available two days a week. They also have a food bank program, every Thursday the drop in gets food from the daily bread food bank. This food then gets redistributed to the women in need. In addition, they have laundry facilities, and a possibility for the women to bathe and/or shower, with or without assistance. For staff, they have a couple of workers working, a cook, a driver & general caretaker, the nurse and the director. The salaries of the staff are paid for by the Ontario Government, but the operating costs are financed through donations. The drop-in also has an art therapy program, and the women like to do a weekly karaoke. In addition to this, the facility gives out clothes to women both for emergency clothing as well as for normal needs. The drop-in is always looking for women's clothing, also in larger sizes, but it should be either new or clean and in excellent shape – just giving these women worn hand-me downs does not help their self-esteem.

When we asked how we could help, Rosie said they're looking for a number of things. Since the facility has to pay the running costs such as electricity, general repairs etc, they do appreciate cash donations – since they are a registered charity it is tax deductible for the donor. They are also looking for volunteers to help out with kitchen clean-up work, contact the drop in 416-964-6936 if you wish to help out. She also told us they need bath towels, since sometimes towels have a tendency to 'walk' after the clients have bathed. This is an area where our Church can help in a small way, and we are planning to have a "towel" drive later this year. Another area where we think we will be able to help is to buy the drop-in four large turkeys for their Christmas dinner.

As the director of the "Gateway" shelter for men put it – "If the Church was doing its job, I'd be out of a job, and that would be a good thing". But let us try baby steps first.

"If I were to lay out all the reasons for my resignation it would take many pages to write out. My reasons will come as absolutely no surprise to most of you. I have openly and publicly expressed my concerns about the direction that the ELCIC has been heading these past few years. Three and a half years ago I could never have imagined what has transpired since then. This has been the most horrific experience of my life, bar none. Some of you who read the BC synod's forum called Grace Words (GW) are more than aware of my position as I have been a frequent contributor since I joined in June 07. This site has been the final straw. I can't fathom that there are debates about whether or not Mary was a virgin when she conceived Jesus, if Jesus is or isn't the only way to the Father, that hell may or may not exist, that everyone will go to heaven regardless of their beliefs or unbelief, etc., and many other debates about what I mistakenly thought were core beliefs. Everything has become iffy. We are left with the end result that the Bible can't be trusted, there is no Truth, and everything is relative. We've been given piles of reasons on Grace Words why much of the Bible is incorrect, or misinterpreted, or is not saying what it so very clearly states. And all of this is coming from pastors / theologians on GW! The material I have read on Grace Words makes the old debate about same sex blessings seem like the good old days in comparison."

The letter illustrates the increasing difficulty that orthodox Lutheran Christians face within the larger Church, and that many Pastors and Theologians are starting to re-evaluate some of the core tenants of our faith. Personally, I believe that God gave us the Bible, a book written by men, but inspired by the Spirit of God. This book's purpose is to teach us how we can get right with God, and I believe it has been written in such a way so that even people without a degree in theology can understand it. I think it is wrong when biblical passages get reinterpreted by the 'experts' in an exactly opposite way as what the text says literally. The letter of resignation concludes with the following:

"At [congregation name], we have not "taken a stand against the devil's schemes" (Ephesians 6:11). We have sat by and have accepted all that is going on around us without taking a formal stand. What kind of faith/religion are we in the ELCIC leaving for those who follow? Did not others who went before us defend the faith so that we could all have something precious and true? What are we doing with this precious faith while on our watch? We are not defending the faith and people's salvation is at stake."

Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thorn bushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them. Matthew 7, 15-20

All this leads me to think about Unit Testing and WPF, and the question: Is unit testing worthwhile for UI? And at what point in time (or complexity) does it make sense to use the MVC or Model View-View-Model-Model pattern?

What do you think? – leave a comment.